<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marriott International takes on search engines over trademark practices</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tnooz.com/2010/03/11/news/marriott-international-takes-on-search-engines-over-trademark-practices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tnooz.com/2010/03/11/news/marriott-international-takes-on-search-engines-over-trademark-practices/</link>
	<description>Talking Travel Tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:41:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Week in Travel Tech - March 7 to March 13 2010 &#124; Tnooz</title>
		<link>http://www.tnooz.com/2010/03/11/news/marriott-international-takes-on-search-engines-over-trademark-practices/#comment-13808</link>
		<dc:creator>The Week in Travel Tech - March 7 to March 13 2010 &#124; Tnooz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tnooz.com/?p=11545#comment-13808</guid>
		<description>[...] Marriott International takes on search engines over trademark practices [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Marriott International takes on search engines over trademark practices [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Sherlock</title>
		<link>http://www.tnooz.com/2010/03/11/news/marriott-international-takes-on-search-engines-over-trademark-practices/#comment-13549</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Sherlock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tnooz.com/?p=11545#comment-13549</guid>
		<description>I agree sites should not be allowed to bid on trademarks unless given direct permission.

However the above example Dennis is not exactly accurate. For example many companies use broad match for the term &quot;hotels &amp; resort&quot; and a search for “Marriott hotels &amp; resorts” will display those advertisers with broad matches for &quot;hotels &amp; resort&quot;. 

But if one does a search for just “Marriott” or just “renaissance” I could not see any competitor bidding in Google. ?

It’s pretty easy for Marriott or anyone else to protect their trademarks. For the brand name ‘oodles’ we have trademarks around the world. (noting we have a trademark in the US and oodle inc doesn&#039;t! given their application was ruled &quot;deceptively similar to oodles&quot;) errr i digress..

So whenever a competitor had squatter on our brand name only (not broad match) we have contacted Google’s Advertising Legal Support Team, and the offending ad was quickly removed. But first we needed to register all our trademark numbers http://adwords.google.com/support/aw/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=6118 

•	Trademark 5
•	Trademark: oodles
•	Country: United Kingdom
•	Word/Design: Word
•	Registered? Yes
•	Application or Registration Number: 2391580</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree sites should not be allowed to bid on trademarks unless given direct permission.</p>
<p>However the above example Dennis is not exactly accurate. For example many companies use broad match for the term &#8220;hotels &amp; resort&#8221; and a search for “Marriott hotels &amp; resorts” will display those advertisers with broad matches for &#8220;hotels &amp; resort&#8221;. </p>
<p>But if one does a search for just “Marriott” or just “renaissance” I could not see any competitor bidding in Google. ?</p>
<p>It’s pretty easy for Marriott or anyone else to protect their trademarks. For the brand name ‘oodles’ we have trademarks around the world. (noting we have a trademark in the US and oodle inc doesn&#8217;t! given their application was ruled &#8220;deceptively similar to oodles&#8221;) errr i digress..</p>
<p>So whenever a competitor had squatter on our brand name only (not broad match) we have contacted Google’s Advertising Legal Support Team, and the offending ad was quickly removed. But first we needed to register all our trademark numbers <a href="http://adwords.google.com/support/aw/bin/answer.py?hl=en&#038;answer=6118" rel="nofollow">http://adwords.google.com/support/aw/bin/answer.py?hl=en&#038;answer=6118</a> </p>
<p>•	Trademark 5<br />
•	Trademark: oodles<br />
•	Country: United Kingdom<br />
•	Word/Design: Word<br />
•	Registered? Yes<br />
•	Application or Registration Number: 2391580</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

