Love it or hate it, TripAdvisor is damn big these days

It’s the travel brand everyone loves to hate. It angers hoteliers and sends the consumer press into a tizzy when something goes wrong. It can only be TripAdvisor.

But here, with remarkable timing given that some financial analysts considered its Q2 2012 results to be slightly short of their expected numbers, are a string of new and eye-watering figures from TripAdvisor.

The top-line number the user review giant always talks about is the number of reviews on the system. In the space of a year the volume of reviews on the system has jumped from 50 million to 75 million.

Yes, that’s 75 million.

The number of members (those with accounts and known to have contributed at least once) now stands at 32 million, a similarly massive leap from the 20 million just 12 months ago.

What other eye-candy data is TripAdvisor sharing today as part of what it calls a “milestone” announcement?

The number of contributions to the site per minute has doubled from 25 to 50 in a year and it now features over 11 million user generated images, up by four million over the same period.

Figures for May 2012 from ComScore say TripAdvisor globally attracts around 56 million visitors every month.

Of course, all this astonishing growth may well help to sooth any worries emerging within the financial community (as well as this), but it will also only further anger those who question TripAdvisor’s model and protocols around collection and managing of reviews.

Many hoteliers (and perhaps even consumers, though their voices are rarely heard) would like to see some kind of verification process put in place so that content is only submitted by users that can prove they stayed at a property or visited an attraction.

There are also issues around the process for getting rid of old reviews from the system.

Yes, hoteliers can ask for reviews to be removed which were written when a property was under former ownership, but the algorithm used to weed out reviews which are just old and probably irrelevant is still a closely guarded secret.

And some might question whether many are thrown down a user review black hole at all given that the number has just soared to 75 million in the space of a year.

Nevertheless, TripAdvisor is a different beast these days and now has investors to think of since its IPO in December last year.

Its latest results, covering for the second quarter of 2012, might have been met with slight disappointment by analysts (or the analysts are just over-egging their expectations), but the company is still making a lot of money.

Revenue for that quarter was up 7% to $197.1 million from the previous period and up 16% y/y from Q2 2011.

Adjusted EBITDA was $96.9 million in Q2 2012, up 15% from Q1 and up 5% y/y.

Anyway, this was the 75 millionth review (perhaps not the most informative piece of content) on the site:

Related posts:

  1. TripAdvisor launches rating display, suspends it after five days amid complaints from hotels
  2. TripAdvisor reaches 50M reviews milestone
  3. Three times more people view TripAdvisor reviews on sites other than TripAdvisor
Kevin May About Kevin May

Kevin May is editor of Tnooz. He joined as a co-founder in August 2009 after spending nearly four years as editor of UK-based business publication Travolution.

Passionate about the business of travel and the internet, Kevin played a major role in establishing Travolution in print, online, events and with an annual awards programme, as well as becoming a regular speaker and moderator at industry events.

Prior to Travolution, Kevin was web editor at Media Week (UK) and also worked in regional newspapers for two years at the Essex Enquirer. He started his career in journalism at the Police Gazette at New Scotland Yard in London.

Comments

  1. Michael Kaye says:

    @Kevin. Very interesting post.

    Makes me kinda wonder….

    Does Trip Advisor include in the 75 million posts the ones that they have removed from the site because they have determined them to be fake?

    How about the old reviews you mention in the post? Are they included in the 75 million.

    • Kevin May Kevin May says:

      @michael – have followed up with TA. Standby………….

    • Anil says:

      Even if such reviews are removed (if within count) I’m sure it’ll be a small number – a 1% fake reviews would mean 750,000. You think TA would have removed 750,000 reviews labelled as fakes/old? I think not. Kevin’s point holds good – TA is damn big!

  2. Michael Kaye says:

    @anil- “Damn big” is an understatement. I’d go with at least, “G-damn big.” Be that as it may, it would be interesting to know how they answer Kevin’s question—or if they answer at all. Perhaps they consider themselves, “Too big to respond.”

Speak Your Mind

*