Hardly influential – warning over fake Instagram love and travel bloggers

“Influencers” is an overused word in the world of tourism marketing, especially in the travel blogging community.

Just because an individual has 100,000 followers on Twitter, or 100,000 fans of a Facebook page, or captures hundreds of likes every time they post a picture on Instagram, does not necessarily mean they are changing behaviour at scale but may have some impact on a handful of consumers opting for a travel product.

In short, there should be some kind of degree of influence, rather than the catch-all “influencer” tag.

But, still, the term “influencer” is likely to be spread around for some time given that it’s become the metric-of-choice in the low-level marketing strategy between individuals and brands (remember, Expedia Inc and Priceline Group spent around $6 billion on marketing in 2015 – Google et al are still considered the places where influence is really made).

One such company that is trying to dispel the myth of “influence” is Hecktic Media, a digital agency that works on campaigns for brands by using so-called “influencers”.

It wanted to examine the concept of “engagement” on the Instagram photo-sharing platform, primarily by looking at where the average level of interaction between a blogger and their army of fans really is.

By looking at over 200 leading travel bloggers (“influencers”) in North America and what happens when they post a picture, Hecktic was able to see how often a picture was “liked” by others and who had the best engagement levels.


The first thing to note is the poor level of engagement, generally, coming it at a lowly 3.48%.

Hecktic says it actually expects this figure to drop even more when the full impact of changes to Instagram’s feed of content (switching from time-line to “best” photos) are fed into similar tests.

But its attention was obviously drawn to what it calls “the outliers” in the graph – those with apparent engagement levels far higher than the average, with some even close to 30%.

The results of its additional analysis may not be surprising to those that have viewed terms such as “reach” with a fair degree of scepticism over the years – but brands without the ability to scrutinise who they might work with would do well to take note.

Hecktic found that a large number of the “engaged” followers to some accounts (it didn’t name and shame, sadly) are just blank accounts.

The report says:

“Sure, all of those ‘likes’ on a photo may look impressive, but in this case, there are no real people behind those fake accounts allegedly ‘liking’ a photo.

“That is completely empty engagement and worthless to any brand or destination looking to reach an influencer’s audience. If it’s fake, it’s worthless.”

In addition to the fake accounts is the use – sometimes in tandem – of bots.

To test out the theory on a potential “influencer” partner, Hecktic says brands should set a notification on an individual’s Instagram account so that they are alerted every time a new image is posted.

“Watch immediately to see who the first few people are who like the photo.

“If it is the same people every time, then they are likely a part of a bot service that automatically likes and/or comments on other accounts so that they can get the same automated engagement in return.”

Hecktic warns that despite the apparent engagement coming from a legitimate account, using it as a metric is invalid, not least because is probably “liked” unseen.

So, not influential at all, in fact – just reasonably smart at gaming the system to portray immense popularity (aka influence) at a superficial level.

NB: Instagram image via Pixabay.

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInEmail to someone
Kevin May

About the Writer :: Kevin May

Kevin May was a co-founder and member of the editorial team from September 2009 to June 2017.



Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Dalene

    Happy to come back from a few days of being offline to see that our research at HMI has gained some traction. There are, however, two points I would like to make to this article.

    (1) While analyzing bloggers, we also took a look at a couple of dozen key brands and destinations. Their engagement was better than the “influencers”, but not by a whole lot, and probably likely because they have more of a budget to put towards garnering engagement. It is also worth pointing out that many brands and destinations use UGC as a strategy to fill their own social media feeds. And where does some of the best content come from? Bloggers and/or other types of influencers.

    (2) There are, for the record, MANY bloggers who are in fact influential, and who can demonstrate such. The point of our research was to help weed out those who are gaming the system (for our internal usage when hiring bloggers), and by sharing some of our findings, to help others pay attention. There are an alarming number of PR, brands, and destinations who do very little (or no) vetting and are solely wooed by big numbers.

    We were not trying to dispel the myth of “influence”, but try to assist in others find those who are in fact, influential.

  2. Ginger Sullo

    Certainly a needed topic…especially if we go further to quantify “influencers” travel influence or even qualifying their allure…there are SaaS social media analytics platforms out there to “handle” this though clearly, such as with Hecktic Media’s has showed…its a low sum percentage gain for travel/hotel brand marketers..and that’s not including the ACTUAL conversions with cruise or hotel bookings! Likely, lower then the 3.5%….the bots or “real” people reacting to these PAID traveler influencers (from travel or retail brands) are of concern…its a wonder how these business models’ margins are sustainable…but, maybe they’re scaleable in quality reach and monetizing these “followers” to book travel packages…would like to see the numbers (and qualified/assessed) in another follow-up article..

  3. Martin

    There is a small start-up working on providing more translating in that domain. True that the follower numbers are often take or amassed long time ago and highly irrelevant today hence the low engagement. Add to that there multitude of spammy “buy followers” schemes on Instagram. Check them out on buzzandgo.com (am not affiliated with them other than knowing the team and product)

  4. Aakash Ranison

    Why companies like facebook(Instagram) put a check on such frauds. Or there is no solution for this problem or they are allowing their users intentionally ?

    • Marco

      That’s the thing, Instagram or Facebook are not doing anything with the websites or apps that sells Followers and Likes >.<


Newsletter Subscription

Please subscribe now to Tnooz’s FREE daily newsletter.

This lively package of news and information from Tnooz’s web site provides a convenient digest of what’s happening in technology that drives the global travel, tourism and hospitality market.

  • Cancel