When a startup claims it is stealing business from Booking.com

BidRoom is the same as countless other startups in the travel industry when they claim to be disrupting bookings or solving travel planning, etc.

Many newbies coming into the sector often say they are the “Uber of X” or the “Airbnb of Y”, but very few go directly for a jugular of a rival, especially one that is hundreds of times bigger.

There is, of course, a difference between the ability to shout loudly with your marketing and actually doing something about it commercially, too.

In one of the more brazen tactics of the last few years, BidRoom claims it will be causing headaches for the likes of Booking.com and Expedia by “undercutting their prices and stealing away bookings”.

The Netherlands-based hotel booking service, which secured a €1 million funding round in June 2016 and operates on an almost negligible commission model, has come up with a process that it says eventually “take over” the online travel agency giant pair.

Fighting talk, of course, so how does believe this can be achieved?

Travellers that have already booked a room on any OTA (but Booking.com, Expedia and Hotels.com are those in its sights) can forward their confirmation email, and then as long as the booking had a free cancellation policy, BidRoom will secure it at a lower rate.

The traveller just has to cancel their existing reservation.

BidRoom then sends the consumer a link to its own platform where they can make a booking under the new rate.

An official says the process can take up to 72 hours to complete, depending on the speed in which the cancellation is made and the new rate negotiated.

“Usually we are able to send the new offers to the consumers on the same day they send us their original booking confirmations.

“Sometimes it’s ten minutes, but sometimes it can take two days or if the booking confirmation is sent to us on the weekend – up to 72 hours.

“The new offers that we send to the consumers are valid for 48 hours, and we promise that the rate won’t increase in that time.”

BidRoom claims the tactic has resulted in “hundreds” of rebookings being made via the service.

Booking.com, inevitably, says it has “no comment” to make.

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInEmail to someone
Kevin May

About the Writer :: Kevin May

Kevin May was a co-founder and member of the editorial team from September 2009 to June 2017.



Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Shah

    Anyone know any company that will help a star up in the travel biz similar to kayak?

  2. Mergim Kacija

    The sustainability of such a business model depends on the willingness of the hotels to “accept” the BidRooms booking I’d imagine, so the OTAs have strong leverage to dissuade MOST of their hotels from doing so. There are, however, some hotels which the OTAs bend to such as high-occupancy, high ADR, luxury hotels which make the OTA selection stronger. They will take advantage of this loophole since their commissions are massive. If BidRooms can pass the legal test, the end result will be a tighter spread between the non-refundable and free-cancel rate to the point where BidRooms gets squeezed out of the equation.

    • Mergim Kacija

      @BidRooms, might be smart to adapt the model and replace a free-cancel booking with a non-refundable instead. Offer the consumer 5% off of OTA non-refundable, take 5% for yourself and charge the hotel 10% commission. This guarantees revenue with a lower commission for the hotel and BidRooms has a more predictable cash-flow to build a business on.

  3. Elnur Seyidli

    1) this business model can make few bucks in the short term, but it is not scalable to become big – for many reasons: margins will be low, hotels will not participate due price parity issues, it is not automatable, etc
    2) fundamentally speaking, any OTA/intermediary/marketplace business model HAS to provide long-term value to both the travellers and the hotels, otherwise it can not grow. As Philip mentioned this model does not provide such value – at least to hotels

  4. Jonathan

    That’s what a start up company should do. Focus on a specific niche market and be the expert. Getting one small slice of a big cake is a really food start.

  5. Evan Davies

    Good luck to you Bidroom, it’s a super tough space but anyone willing to start-up against the monopolies is a good thing in the end. I cant see how you are making any money on all this though?

  6. S Ramesh

    i will take positive from bidroom, hotel can avoid dependency on the one OTA, may be our product marketed in unknown region.

  7. Philipp

    Long term this is not helping the hotel and only results in less profitability which is also easily traceable for the hotel. If they see the re-bookings coming at lower costs, this will likely result in close outs as it always happens when wholesale rates are fed to direct clients at scale.
    The automation can be only achieved with channel managed hotels which is only a small share of hotels.
    Maybe they manage to survive but its a jump in the red ocean as there is no innovation and no new market added.
    Good Luck

  8. Peter Syme

    Interesting business model that will have challenges with scaling and profitability. However I would suggest one of the main risks is that you actually start to register on booking.com sights due to the amount of cancellations they get. A quick change to the T&C of their contracts with the hotels with regards the amount of cancelled bookings per month and you will have a major headache at worst or long drawn out expensive legal battles at worst

  9. Ralph

    Good luck to bidroom! Don’t listen to naysayers 🙂
    It’s nice to see something different on the market, and every company had to start from small beginnings.

    I’m assuming how it works is that you take a lower commission on the same rate already sold, giving back that discount to the guest. You’ll obviously need hotels who are willing to play the game to reduce their dependence on the large OTA, or your take in commission is so low that even the hotel gets more revenue back.
    If you are a super low commission model, good luck making the business as seamless as possible in terms of ARI feeds and booking delivery.

  10. CaymanChris

    Is this strategy primarily converting refundable bookings into non-refundable? Do you see the big players’ nonrefundable rates equal to yours (if offered) or are you able to undercut those?

    • Bart @ Bidroom

      Hi Chris, the offers that we send to the users are still refundable. The offer is basically the same, except for the price, which we cut down.

  11. Valyn Perini

    So this is a channel hotels can use to drive their rates even lower than booking.com? Why would a hotel want to participate?

    • Bart @ Bidroom

      Hello Valyn. It’s profitable for the hotels to participate, because they can save money on each of those re-bookings. We don’t charge any commission, so it’s better for the hotels to get a commission-free booking with a minimum of 5% discount, than to get a booking from one of the major OTAs.

  12. Filip Bloch

    Well, is not so hard to steal clients from booking.com if they have 1.000.000 bookings a day.
    Q :
    Is this marginal or serious for booking?
    How many bookings bidroom does a month?
    How many clients wish to wait 72h, download, etc to get few euro discount?
    Is this process manual or automated?
    How this can scale?
    Wish you the best Michael & Team!

    • Bart @ Bidroom

      Hey Filip, thanks for the best wishes!

      I can’t really go in-detail with the stats, but when it comes to the process, I’d call it semi-automated, as it depends on some factors, like whether the particular hotel is already on our platform, or whether the hotel uses a channel manager. Sometimes an in-between manual process is required, but often it’s automatic and the new, better offers can be sent to the guests in just a few minutes.

      • Filip Bloch

        Semi-automated platforms with benefit of human touch and speed of OTA look very promissing for travel industry.
        As Nicloas mentioned is tricky to say “I`m the cheapest” cose you need to already agrue on this.
        Beside gigants can go dumping and kill value proposition of innovative startup.

  13. Nicolas Salin

    If i learnt something at managing VeryLastRoom, a last-minute hotel booking app for several years and continue to do it… it is :
    “It’s fucking expensive to tell people than you’re the cheapest !”. ^^

    You know why ?
    because everybody says that they’re the cheapest ! 🙂

    So in consumer minds, it is just noise… it has so little impact , that marketing is outrageously expensive. And if you add to this, the fact that customer LTV in travel is low… as people don’t take enough vacations in their life (myself included)… 🙂 … Plus the fact that, as they take not enough vacations, you have to remind them to use your service (big costs of re-engagement) … your chances to develop a sustainable business model at scale become very thin.

  14. Valentin Dombrovky

    While Booking.com searches for the ways to sue this startup, it has no comments to make. 😉

    • Silviu Preoteasa - Marketing Technology

      Big B won’t bother with BidRoom if the Triptease ordeal taught us anything – they will slam the hotels. Make an example of a few, get BidRoom starved of inventory at source. Interested how the investors thought this could work – this a new proxy in another war?

  15. Bobby Healy

    Challenge this business will have will be to acquire customers. Without commission or a reduced one… How will they Compete on Google?

    • Bart @ Bidroom

      Competing on Google is not Bidroom’s battle to fight. Contrary to some other booking platforms, Bidroom does not try to hijack the hotel’s brand, instead the platform promotes the hotels, for example through its Social Media channels and newsletters.

      • Kevin May

        Kevin May

        @BART – there are 600-odd failed consumer-facing travel startups that have claimed social media channels and newsletters is the way to get traffic, just an FYI.

        • Bart @ Bidroom

          Sure, but I was only talking about promoting the hotels that sign up to Bidroom.com. This is an extra thing that we can do for them. Social Media and Newsletters surely aren’t the only channels we promote our own platform through. We have a growing Marketing team whose objective is to put Bidroom on the map of the biggest hotel booking platforms. We’re getting there.

        • Omer affti

          There is few successful similar products, the best 2 are dreamchaper.com and roomsninja.com they both working for 2 years now, doing great work, nothing innovative in bidroom.

  16. Patrick Landman

    Patrick @ Xotels

    Sounds great. But if hotels don’t play the game it’s going to get tough ….

    Hotels should stay away from any business model that drives down rates like this. In the end they will start charging commission as well …. and you will have created another monster …

    • Michael Ros

      Hi Patrick,

      As you can read there is a benefit for the user and hotel. I can also confirm that we will not start to charge a commission, so we will not turn into a “monster”. We are the good guys! By the way, your colleague Remko likes us! 😉

    • Kalpesh

      That’s correct . Hotel have not learn anything for any of past mistake. This is not good practice from bidroom. they have one good model of lower commission and guarantee lower rate to certain % so why they want some one to cancel and rebook again . I don’t under stand the logic and also should not do this type of practice . it is not good

      • Michael Ros

        It’s better for the hotels to get a new booking coming from Bidroom instead of getting one from other OTAs, because they can save commission money, as Bidroom doesn’t charge any commission.

        Also, re-booking with Bidroom is just an additional feature, not a replacement of our booking platform. The business model remains unchanged, and consumers can still save at least 5% on each booking when making a reservation on the platform.

        • Julie Fawcett

          If you don’t take commission – just like Trip Advisor didn’t used to…. then what is your revenue model both now and how will it scale to be a more attractive revenue source in the future than the current commission levels gained by the big OTA’s? … cos if it isnt better then future stakeholders and funders will have a hard time justifying a ‘moral’ position on commission and just as Google went from ‘ do no evil’ to max the shit out of everything at all costs so will this platform. That all said.. I do think its an interesting idea .. does it have enough funding to give it a long enough runway ?


Newsletter Subscription

Please subscribe now to Tnooz’s FREE daily newsletter.

This lively package of news and information from Tnooz’s web site provides a convenient digest of what’s happening in technology that drives the global travel, tourism and hospitality market.

  • Cancel