It’s the end of search as we know it (and I feel fine)

Over the years, online hotel bookings have increased dramatically: according to Statista, last year the market value for hotel reservation made on the web was over 42 billion in the US alone. However, the search volume on classic search engines (such as Google or Bing) for generic travel-related keywords is constantly decreasing. Let’s analyze this GoogleTrend’s graph for the query “Hotels in Paris” over the past decade:


Now let’s compare it with a different term: “trivago”.

metasearchSurprised? You shouldn’t be. This, in fact, does not mean that web users are no longer interested in booking a hotel in Paris (or in any other city, as the trend is pretty much the same on every destination), but simply that the starting point for online bookings is no longer, as it used to be, the classic search engine, but what is technically called a vertical search engine or, more specifically, a metasearch engine.

The evolution of search

But let’s take a step back. Until a few years ago, booking a hotel online was a remarkably frustrating experience: once you chose the destination you had to browse through dozens of sites, search for rates, location, fill endless contact forms to, eventually, find out that the hotel you liked was fully booked. This process could take days, while today the same result can be achieved by simply applying a filter on TripAdvisor, with a much faster and less frustrating UX.

Back in 2008, without a proper aggregator, the only possibility web users had was to search for very generic keywords on search engines. This explains why, only a decade ago, the query “Hotels in Paris” was at its peak of popularity, while today the same query produces only 1/4 of the original volume.


Hyperlink organization is no longer enough

At its core, a metasearch engine is nothing more than a content aggregator, we all know that. Instead of indexing the whole surface web, a metasearch engine focuses on specific pages, related to a specific topic to provide specific results. Their success (not only in travel) is due to the fact that, as the contents on the web become more complex and heterogeneous (images, videos, news, etc.), the traditional hyperlink organization is no longer sufficient.

As I write this paragraph, there are more than a billion web pages and, according to a study conducted by QMee, five hundred more are created every minute. So, especially in the case of an industry like ours, characterized by a large dispersion of information, metasearch engines are particularly useful to find the information one is looking for.

Metasearch engines are nothing new

Although metasearch engines in travel started to grow during the last decade, their ancestors can be traced back to the 90’s: the search engines results’ fragmentation back then, in fact, generated the need for specific aggregators, such as MetaCrawler, BigSearcher, lxquck or Vivissimo.  And, even though the advancement of search engines algorithms made this comparison tools no longer necessary over time, metasearch engines are still of extraordinary value in those situations where the information are very fragmented, such as, for example, that of hotel rates and inventory distribution.

Is SEO dead?

According to a New York Times study, less than 15% of the online search leading to a purchase starts from a classic search engine. This means that, for a hotel, being among the first positions for secondary keywords such as “Hotel + City” or “Best Hotel + City” is no longer as crucial as it used to be. On the contrary, we can safely say that it is pretty much useless. Most of the guests will discover a hotel on a vertical search engine (or on an OTA, or an app) anyway, so the SEO efforts needed to be indexed for these secondary keywords are getting less and less important in terms of pure brand awareness. “SEO is dead” is surely an overstatement but, at least in the accommodation industry, this seems to be (at least partially) the case.

Excellent acquisitions

Thanks to the improved user experience of these aggregators, predictably, in recent years there has been a real acquisition race by hospitality big players, anxious to exploit the potential of these platforms. In 2013, Booking Holdings acquired KAYAK and, in 2017 the Momondo Group; Skyscanner is controlled by Ctrip (which has a commercial partnership with Priceline since 2012), while Expedia Group owns the majority of trivago’s stock.

According to SimilarWeb, more than 10% of the traffic comes from metasearch, and that number used to be way higher, up until when the Priceline Group (which accounted for more than 40% of trivago’s revenue) decided to dramatically reduce its investments in metasearch ads. Expedia shares similar numbers.

Hybrid metasearch engines

This decrease in investment can seem surprising, but let’s take into consideration that the line between metasearch engines and OTAs is getting more blurry every day, so there is a real risk of advertising overkill and brand dilution.

For example: Stephen Kaufer, TripAdvisor’s CEO, has repeatedly claimed to be more than satisfied with the metasearch model and not interested in becoming an OTA, but this seems merely a matter of semantics.

The latest metasearch tactics, in fact, have several grey areas, with OTAs advertising on metasearch engines and metasearch engines advertising on different metasearch engines, on a PPC endless vicious circle. This ambiguity could impact the whole metasearch ecosystem and, on a future not so far away, OTAs could play the only role of simple booking engines, where the user lands just to put his credit card data, after having chosen the hotel on an aggregator.

It is not surprising, therefore, that after over a decade of monopoly in the online distribution, the major OTAs had to (at least partially) reinvent themselves, by diversifying and broaden their products in order to stay relevant. Think about all the B2B tools that the main players provide today: from BookingSuite’s RateIntelligence to Expedia Travel Ads. Because, if up until now metasearch engines merely aggregated third-party data, they now provide the option to complete one’s reservation without even leaving the result page. And that, for an OTA, is a problem.

Fixing the search

According to Terri Scriven, Head of Travel for Google UK, an average consumer today consults up to ten different sites with an average of over thirty searches before making a purchase: an extremely complex, confusing and difficult process, especially if you consider how much disparity, both of information and rates, can be found on the different distribution channels. Therefore, “fixing” this fragmented booking journey is an ambitious (yet not so far-fetched) goal
for the Alphabet’s company.

Google has profoundly changed our habits and not just the online ones. According to a study by Columbia University, for example, the action of googling has even an impact on the way we store memories. The human brain, in fact, underwent a deep change in the way it stores information, producing authentic selective amnesias : we now tend to forget all those things that we are sure we can find online with a minimal effort. Our minds simply adapted. So, referring to Google as just a search engine is an understatement, to say the least.

The end of metasearch engines

On the contrary, it could be the one player able to simplify the booking process once for all, which could start and end without the users not even leaving the SERP. Think about how Google improved the MyBusiness listings look over the years, for example, with more accurate contents, photos, reviews, rates, availability, Q&A, and suggestions, making them look almost like OTA’s mini hotel pages.

This is no longer a question of classic search vs vertical search, but rather “post-vertical-search” or “post-metasearch” (to use neologisms), where Google could provide results, contents, inventory, and -eventually- process the final transactions. Google, at least in the US, allows guests paying for their booking through its wallet : instead of redirecting the click to the advertiser’s booking engine, the system simply displays a Buy With Google button, that takes the user to a hotel-branded page hosted by Google. Checkout is simplified and the user can easily book his room. A much more fluid, satisfying, frictionless and user-friendly experience, of course, but with a real risk of market monopoly.

What now?

The times when Google used to simply showed ten organic results seems like history. On a standard Google search, in fact, it is easy to get multimedia results directly in the SERP. Try googling “funny cats” and you will probably only have 3 or 4 links, together with a dozen of videos and images. According to several studies, last year Google responded with universal search results to more than 80% of queries, (mainly YouTube videos, images, and news). Having all the “action” in the SERP could be a revolutionary step in hospitality, as it would bypass OTAs, websites and metasearch tout-court. Let’s keep in mind that travel is the third industry for revenue for Google, preceded only by financial services and retail, so the interest is pretty high.


The extreme competitiveness in travel is slowly bringing search engines, OTAs and metasearch engines to converge towards an increasingly homogeneous model. The reason is simple, almost Darwinian: the model that will prove to be the most efficient in terms of scalability and efficiency for the end user is going to prevail. Larry Page once described the “perfect search engine” as something that “understands exactly what you mean and gives you back exactly what you want”. Judging by the results that Google gives us back today, we are not so far away from it.

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInEmail to someone
Simone Puorto

About the Writer :: Simone Puorto

Simone Puorto is a passionate marketing geek. After managing two hotels and running a team of consultants, he eventually focused on his biggest passion: writing. Over the last decade, he has worked with hundreds of hotels, web agencies, startups, and travel-tech providers worldwide. All these experiences ended up in two best-selling books and hundreds of articles. He's an MBA Lecturer Professor, Advisory Board Member for BWG Strategy, panel moderator, public speaker and regular contributor for blogs and magazines such as tnooz, HOTELSMag, HotelTechReport, and Booking Blog. In 2017 he launched his own company (Simone Puorto Consulting) and in 2018 he co-founded the hospitality chatbot startup Tell the Hotel.



Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Max Starkov

    Simobe, oogle organic search contributes to 25%-30% of Hotel website bookings. This is more than bookings coming from repeat guests at the hotel for the average independent hotel. SEO is more than searching for the obvious, highly competitive primary destination keywords (like Hotels in Paris). Travel consumers have become savvy online shoppers and nobody is searching for Hotels in Paris since they know that they will see million broad results in the Google SERP. Instead they search for “boutique Hotel near Musee d’Orsay” I.e. using long tail keywords.

    Smart hotel marketers focus on page-centric SEO, and not keyword-centric SEO. They focus on deep, relevant and unique content presenting the hotel as the hero of the destination. They focus on descriptive content utilizing branded and long tail keyword terms ( ex. Puerto de la Cruz beach hotel, Fanabe beach hotel, El Medano Hotel with rooftop bar, family-friendly Tenerife beach hotel, etc.) They focus on technical SEO, automated markup, Google AMP-enabled website pages, high authority inbound linking.

    As for meta search, this advertising for at is way past its prime due to OTA and Hotel consolidations. What is there to metasearch? If you are looking for a particular hotel you have 3 options left: Hotel website, and Expedia. If you are looking for best deals in a destination – you go to and Expedia. Meta search players are dying a slow and painful death, and they already know it, same as all of the once popular online retail shopping engines that have been decimated by Amazon.

    • Dieter Ordonez

      I agree with Max, people are wise hence they are searching smarter. Key is to detect this trends. To say that SEO is pretty much useless is a bold statement.

  2. Ginger Sullo

    Intrigued with Google Wallet access bypassing credit card processing fees (avg. 2.8%) and carrying thru with a more holistic travel journey.

    Curious if anyone knows Google’s U.S. percentage of those booking travel/hotels via the Google Wallet, my guess is 10% at most, and pending how G continues to push in this area, this “end to end” Google traveler journey would have severe repurcussios for the OTA’s….also kinds of trip bookings/LOS, expenditures…its far more telling then just Wallet purchase due to today’s traveler “mindset” across an increasingly omni-channel landscape.

  3. jonny

    Don’t forget that as the OTAs race to have all properties in the world, the meta search engines won’t be needed. Handling the bookings, integration with hotel reservation systems and service is really hard and none of the metas will likely be able to catch up. Ig Google decides to offer end-to-end one day they’d be a threat but its a real revenue cannibalization act meanwhile. Amazon the other player with enough muscle to actually do this but their attempts so far havent been fruitful.

  4. Yannis

    There’s a consistency with Simone’s articles: they are the richest and most deep down analysis of a subject that I read in any travel news media. Good job one again Simone!

  5. Guy Schlacter

    Imam so glad I found your article. I have been making similar arguments that your data supports; search is dying for vacation rental travel as well, imstead replace by the traveler directly accessing their favorite website. Vacation Rental owners are trying to regain control of their rentals and small businesses. The big 4 have inserted fees of up to 21% without bring any additional value over the tradition subscription based fixed price advertising model on the listing sites. In the end, I believe he next winners will be new brands that are just starting, that recognize the public won’t pay the middleman valueless sums, and reinstitute a subscription listing model. These new sites will also be able to integrate with the Aggregator as well as Google’s own metadata search/filter/sort capabilities coming online. But the biggest question is whether google gets great and inserts a commission, or whether they will rely on placement bidding revenue from lostings within the search results.

  6. Dorian Harris

    “Judging by the results that Google gives us back today, we are not so far away from it.” Google exists on the back of fragmentation. The less visits to Google to piece together a trip, the bigger the hit on Google’s bottom line. I don’t see Google rushing to solve that problem, do you?

  7. Liz Andrea

    Hi. How can an independet small business win this battle against ota’s 30% less and big monopolios?

    • Simone Puorto

      Simone Puorto

      That’s the point Liz. IMHO there’s no battle to fight.

      Moreover cost per acquisition for direct bookings tends to be extremely high for small business. I had a client paying an average of 52% for a direct reservation, no kidding!
      Wrong metasearch ads strategy, poorly allocated budget on search engines ads, ridiculously high web agency mark-ups, website design, booking engine costs, etc… Pretty easy to overspend in direct.

      There’s no such thing as a 0 commission reservation. The only difference is that is pretty easy to understand the “cost” of a reservation, while it’s way harder to break the real CPA down when it comes to your own website.

      And let’s say that a duopoly is less risky than a monopoly, anyway 😉

  8. Natasha Spokes

    Great article Simone. This is such a fascinating topic and it’s so interesting to watch the meta search space in travel develop. We are working on something at FarCloser Travel that tries to solve a lot of the problems that meta search has addressed for hotels but for cruises and tours so it’s very interesting to read your perspective on how the market is changing and the direction things are going. Thanks for sharing!

  9. Richard Bedenham

    Fantastic article. The issue of content consistency in terms of offers, rates, inventory and content across the major distribution groups I believe is a major challenge for hotels. The challenge is that players are always trying to find new ways to differentiate themselves and hotels struggle to ‘police’ things.
    I think basic content structure SEO still needs to occur, but your right in that most hotels are found on vertical search. I do think that search engines are still an integral part. They may use it more at the dreaming phase and then less as they move through to booking. Of course, using search for anything these days, travel related, sees the main players dominating ad space and the first set of results, so very quickly a traveler is going to end up on a major players website, OTA, TripAdvisor etc.
    Changes in search to bring more videos, images as well as text is a massive opportunity for hoteliers. More chance of videos getting seen during the micro moments of travel. Thanks for sharing.

    On the subject of search, I agree with you that less focus should be placed on SEO in a traditional sense. I mean travelers are now Travelers looking for inspiration are likely to skip past search and venture into large player destination specific content. I do believe that search still plays a significant part.

    • Simone Puorto

      Simone Puorto

      Thank you Richard. I agree with you that compliance with Google guidelines when it comes to coding, copywriting and site structure still plays a big role. For some specific destinations or particular markets (such as MICE, for example), long-tail-keywords are still kinda relevant, even though some meeting rooms metasearch engines / booking engines are emerging.
      Speak soon!


Newsletter Subscription

Please subscribe now to Tnooz’s FREE daily newsletter.

This lively package of news and information from Tnooz’s web site provides a convenient digest of what’s happening in technology that drives the global travel, tourism and hospitality market.

  • Cancel